Review+Sean


 * PRESENTER___Sean__ **
 * REVIEWER __Ross____ **
 * 1. Did the presentation clearly describe the aims of the research – empirical, conceptual, methodological and practical? **
 * Yeah, still working on the conceptual though **
 * 2. Did the presentation provide an overview of what we already know about the research subject, and then explain how the proposed research will create new knowledge? **
 * Yes **
 * 3. Did the presentation provide a robust sense of ****// how //**** the research will be carried out, and of the type of data that will be collected? **
 * For the most part **
 * 4. Did the research plan presented seem credible and feasible? **
 * Some slightly quixotic…like flying all over the world to multiple locations…but hey, it’s something to shoot for. **
 * 5. Did the presentation provide a tangible sense of the book and other outcomes of the research? **
 * No, but I think it was implied you’d like to engage with industry? **
 * 6. Did the presentation persuade you that the proposed research is important, in this historical moment in particular? **
 * I wouldn’t be very PC (especially in our department) if I claimed something to do with the environment wasn’t important…but even without that, yes it appears important **
 * 7. Was the speaking style clear, engaging and well timed? **
 * I thought there was probably too much on the background (my problem as well) **
 * 8. Further comments and questions. **