MitchellCommentMemo1-2Barton

Memo1 -First -Do you already know that the structure of regulatory agencies limit enforcement…you are just asking a how question? -Maybe they have different ideas of what “enforcement” entails… -Your bias might make you conclude that it isn’t “enforced” -I.E. how are you defining enforcement? -Yeah…you’re pretty biased…maybe a participatory action research opportunity?

-Second -I’d definitely add visual analysis

-Third -I don’t know what a rifer is…I looked it up and only found “rife”…as in “abundant” -How are you differentiating yourself from current suppression literature?

-Fourth -Would you follow one particular technology? -What is a “fair trial”…maybe you’re just a champion of garbage that deserves to be rejected? -I’d be interested in what theoretical tradition you’d draw on…

Memo 2 -As I said to Nathan, I find it quite difficult to comment on someone’s talents, neuroses and habits. What should I say, “No, you’re lying to yourself.” -In regards to the first…how about write simultaneously while reading? -I don’t think you should agonize over what people in other fields have done…anyone is only ever going to provide a sentence or two of insight (what people cite)…there is always room for more -If timing is your problem, write things down at all times…therefore while some might be crap (as it was wrongly timed) other stuff which was written at the correct time will come out perfect. -I write a few sentences at a time and pace as well, so you’re not alone. -I too dislike phones -Yeah, better notes…write as you go -You didn’t provide much craziness in your neuroses…are you trying to front like you’re the most normal one around here?