LamprouCommentCluck

Proposal Presentation Review

Presenter: Jon Cluck Reviewer: Anna Lamprou

Methodological yes; Why is it important although? How scientists do their job? A lot of history and narrative, I don’t get the new knowledge NO There wasn't any plan of study in the presentation. Not really. Not really, but it might be Yes, very well I would prefer it better if the presenter had a presentation that looked more like a project.
 * 1. Did the presentation clearly describe the aims of the research – empirical, conceptual, methodological and practical? **
 * 2. Did the presentation provide an overview of what we already know about the research subject, and then explain how the proposed research will create new knowledge? **
 * 3. Did the presentation provide a robust sense of //how// the research will be carried out, and of the type of data that will be collected? **
 * 4. Did the research plan presented seem credible and feasible? **
 * 5. Did the presentation provide a tangible sense of the book and other outcomes of the research? **
 * 6. Did the presentation persuade you that the proposed research is important, in this historical moment in particular? **
 * 7. Was the speaking style clear, engaging and well timed? **
 * 8. Further comments and questions. **