MitchellcommentTang

Presenter: Denver Reviewer: Ross Unlike most other presentations, I got much more of the conceptual than the empirical and practical.
 * 1. Did the presentation clearly describe the aims of the research – empirical, conceptual, methodological and practical?**

You touched on lots of things, but as you yourself acknowledged it all needs to be fleshed out more fully and incorporated
 * 2. Did the presentation provide an overview of what we already know about the research**
 * subject, and then explain how the proposed research will create new knowledge?**

Robust no, but I get the basic sense
 * 3. Did the presentation provide a robust sense of** **//how//** **the research will be carried out, and of the type of data that will be collected?**

Seems like a lot of “levels” of analysis
 * 4. Did the research plan presented seem credible and feasible?**

Yes
 * 5. Did the presentation provide a tangible sense of the book and other outcomes of the research?**

Not totally…it seems like these questions could fit into older debates just fine
 * 6. Did the presentation persuade you that the proposed research is important, in this historical moment in particular?**

Yes
 * 7. Was the speaking style clear, engaging and well timed?**


 * 8. Further comments and questions.**