MitchellCommentFodness

Presenter: Kevin Reviewer: Ross Empirical and practical are crystal clear. Don’t know about the conceptual, but hey it’s a work in progress.
 * 1. Did the presentation clearly describe the aims of the research – empirical, conceptual, methodological and practical?**

Yes, people ignore the disabled
 * 2. Did the presentation provide an overview of what we already know about the research**
 * subject, and then explain how the proposed research will create new knowledge?**

Not completely clear because I don’t know what you’ll be gleaning from the subjects.
 * 3. Did the presentation provide a robust sense of** **//how//** **the research will be carried out, and of the type of data that will be collected?**

Yes
 * 4. Did the research plan presented seem credible and feasible?**

Other outcomes definitely
 * 5. Did the presentation provide a tangible sense of the book and other outcomes of the research?**

Yes
 * 6. Did the presentation persuade you that the proposed research is important, in this historical moment in particular?**

Yes, if not slightly fast (but with the time limit, who doesn’t speak fast)
 * 7. Was the speaking style clear, engaging and well timed?**


 * 8. Further comments and questions.**