CluckCommentSean

Proposal Presentation Review Presenter: Sean Reviewer: Jon C.

1. Did the presentation clearly describe the aims of the research – empirical, conceptual, methodological and practical? Yes, but you are missing some framework stuff, which you admit...

2. Did the presentation provide an overview of what we already know about the research subject, and then explain how the proposed research will create new knowledge? Definitely.

3. Did the presentation provide a robust sense of how the research will be carried out, and of the type of data that will be collected? Yes.

4. Did the research plan presented seem credible and feasible? Yes.

5. Did the presentation provide a tangible sense of the book and other outcomes of the research? No, but this is alright, you are still early-on in the research process and the project is ongoing.

6. Did the presentation persuade you that the proposed research is important, in this historical moment in particular? Yes. (Plastic bottles are piling up and we're screwed.)

7. Was the speaking style clear, engaging and well timed? Yes, you were very engaged with the material and the audience.

8. Further comments and questions.