LamprouCommentSaheb

Proposal Presentation Review

Presenter: Tahereh Saheb Reviewer: Anna Lamprou

Not very clear. Practical yes but not enough conceptual and methodological. Yes but a little disconnected from the literature. So even though the research will be something new, because those robots do not exist yet, I am not sure how new knowledge is going to be produced. I am not sure what the researcher is going to do for data collection. I find the subject of study very interesting but since the robots do not exist yet, I think the researcher should think more clear about how she Is going to proceed with the research. Who Is going to Interview and why? Well, the plan of study seems feasible but not clear to me. The outcomes yes. Helping schizophrenic people with the use of robots. Yes, I think there is a shift in the conception of care and robots are or may be an aspect of that. Yes, on time. Sonya, you are a first year student don't commit to one project yet. Try to be open in ideas.
 * 1. Did the presentation clearly describe the aims of the research – empirical, conceptual, methodological and practical? **
 * 2. Did the presentation provide an overview of what we already know about the research subject, and then explain how the proposed research will create new knowledge? **
 * 3. Did the presentation provide a robust sense of //how// the research will be carried out, and of the type of data that will be collected? **
 * 4. Did the research plan presented seem credible and feasible? **
 * 5. Did the presentation provide a tangible sense of the book and other outcomes of the research? **
 * 6. Did the presentation persuade you that the proposed research is important, in this historical moment in particular? **
 * 7. Was the speaking style clear, engaging and well timed? **
 * 8. Further comments and questions. **