Sonya(Nathen)

Proposal Presentation Review

Presenter: Nathan Fisk Reviewer: Tahereh Saheb(Sonya)


 * 1. Did the presentation clearly describe the aims of the research – empirical, conceptual, methodological and practical?**


 * He did not talk about the aims clearly, but I think his questions show his aims**


 * 2. Did the presentation provide an overview of what we already know about the research subject, and then explain how the proposed research will create new knowledge?**


 * His explanations on the background was not clear to me** ** L **


 * 3. Did the presentation provide a robust sense of //how// the research will be carried out, and of the type of data that will be collected?**


 * Yes, he did**


 * 4. Did the research plan presented seem credible and feasible?**


 * yes it Is**


 * 5. Did the presentation provide a tangible sense of the book and other outcomes of the research?**


 * No, It did not, maybe because of time shortage**


 * 6. Did the presentation persuade you that the proposed research is important, in this historical moment in particular?**


 * yes, It is**
 * 7. Was the speaking style clear, engaging and well timed?**


 * he was clear and engaging but not well timed**


 * 8. Further comments and questions.**

His explanations on theories was a lot