Patzke+Binaries+2

So I've added just a few more categories, but I'm also trying to link the excluding middle to method/theory/STS work as well.

**(my question for you is, “What concepts fit these excluded middles?” )** ||  **Binary II**  || (Habermas, Dewey) ||  Public/Free  || (concept – Gene Talk - Keller, Kay) ||  Chemical compounds  || Reardon’s work?) ||  Biotech industry  ||
 * **Binary I** ||  **Excluded Middle**
 * Legal Binaries:** || || ||
 * Precedent (the legal past) ||  (minor technologies)  ||  Legal Fictions (future)  ||
 * Dicta (part of an ruling) ||  Seeing both as a whole  ||  Dissent (from the majority ruling)  ||
 * Dissent || ||  Majority Opinion  ||
 * Discursive Binaries:** ||  ||   ||
 * Law ||  Co-production (ugh)  ||  Science  ||
 * Property (material) ||  Chemical sequences  ||  Information  ||
 * Private/Profit ||  How the law sees both
 * Law ||  Co-production (ugh)  ||  Science  ||
 * Property (material) ||  Chemical sequences  ||  Information  ||
 * Private/Profit ||  How the law sees both
 * Biological information ||  Genes
 * Magic microscope test ||  Legal fictions (Eben Moglen’s essay on the subject)  ||  Machine or transformation test  ||
 * Precedent as law ||  Conflict resolution and compromise  ||  Codes as law  ||
 * Change ||  Negotiation  ||  Status Quo  ||
 * Advocate ||  Law? Judges? (concept – Jasanoff’s co-production of social order)  ||  Scientists  ||
 * Patient advocacy ||  (Epstein’s work?
 * Method Binaries** ||  ||   ||
 * Ethnography ||  Discourse  ||  Document analysis  ||
 * Ethnography ||  Discourse  ||  Document analysis  ||