LamprouCommentMitchell

Proposal Presentation Review

Presenter: Ross Mitchell Reviewer: Anna Lamprou

Yes, although talked a lot about how the presenter views it. Not why we should think about it or why it is important. Yes, It Is an understudied area, so knew knowledge will be created from understanding this χείμερα. Not really so much. But I think is feasible. He mentioned very broadly the sites and In general scientists. But It Is feasible. Yes, I think so. Not sure about this. My imagination is poor in thinking of a book Yes, as always science is moving ahead and policy Issues are left behind. Many unknowns that come from the science must be handle by the policy Yes. I think the presenter’s moral orientation will affect the ethical result.
 * 1. Did the presentation clearly describe the aims of the research – empirical, conceptual, methodological and practical? **
 * 2. Did the presentation provide an overview of what we already know about the research subject, and then explain how the proposed research will create new knowledge? **
 * 3. Did the presentation provide a robust sense of //how// the research will be carried out, and of the type of data that will be collected? **
 * 4. Did the research plan presented seem credible and feasible? **
 * 5. Did the presentation provide a tangible sense of the book and other outcomes of the research? **
 * 6. Did the presentation persuade you that the proposed research is important, in this historical moment in particular? **
 * 7. Was the speaking style clear, engaging and well timed? **
 * 8. Further comments and questions. **