LamprouCommentFisk

Proposal Presentation Review

Presenter: Nate Fisk Reviewer: Anna Lamprou

Yes, there were described the aims of the research. Not so much the practical although. But when you are talking about youth internet safety I guess it is obvious. Yes, Nate knows very well his subject of study from previous research as well. It was clear how new knowledge is going to be produced. No one has done something like that before. Yes, very clear. Nate has already data. Yes. Ok, is it going to be a book about kids, internet, and moral panics? It is important in general I am not sure why it is important in this particular moment. Yes, well done Nate. Very good. The best presentation style and ppt of the day.
 * 1. Did the presentation clearly describe the aims of the research – empirical, conceptual, methodological and practical? **
 * 2. Did the presentation provide an overview of what we already know about the research subject, and then explain how the proposed research will create new knowledge? **
 * 3. Did the presentation provide a robust sense of //how// the research will be carried out, and of the type of data that will be collected? **
 * 4. Did the research plan presented seem credible and feasible? **
 * 5. Did the presentation provide a tangible sense of the book and other outcomes of the research? **
 * 6. Did the presentation persuade you that the proposed research is important, in this historical moment in particular? **
 * 7. Was the speaking style clear, engaging and well timed? **
 * 8. Further comments and questions. **