CluckCommentRoss

Proposal Presentation Review Presenter: Ross Reviewer: Jon C. 1. Did the presentation clearly describe the aims of the research – empirical, conceptual, methodological and practical? Yes.

2. Did the presentation provide an overview of what we already know about the research subject, and then explain how the proposed research will create new knowledge? Yes, this project will definitely fit well with the existing literature, and hopefully introduce some new ideas.

3. Did the presentation provide a robust sense of how the research will be carried out, and of the type of data that will be collected? Not in depth, there wasn't enough time...

4. Did the research plan presented seem credible and feasible? Yep. 5. Did the presentation provide a tangible sense of the book and other outcomes of the research? Not the book, but there is definitely a tangible outcome to your research.

6. Did the presentation persuade you that the proposed research is important, in this historical moment in particular? Yes, definitely.

7. Was the speaking style clear, engaging and well timed? Extremely good engagement with the audience and the material -- I think you were the only one who was 'interrupted' by audience members (and you took it in stride).

8. Further comments and questions. Looking into the bioethics literature might not be overly helpful, but it helps to know how this issue has already been thought through and give you familiarity with how people think when it comes to ethics. Your questions slide had too many words on it, maybe you could show each category of question on a different slide?