Sketch+3+(LMB)+Literatures

Disaster STS
 * [See Spring 2016 syllabus]**

__**Three Core Theoretical Literatures**__


 * Ignorance**

Allows to articulate how ignorances are build into the problematization and governance of heat, and its political consequences. Here part. regulatory science (beyond regulatory in the polity); Ignorances in knowledge orders, technological orders and social orders, & their co-production ...

Allows to articulate how governance of heat, decentrally thought, re-thinks social and political orders, re-designs life and its social, material, cultural and technological fabric, and how gets to participate in this on what terms and conditions. - Problematization, - Biopolitics, - Governance - Apparatus
 * Governance**

Brings into perspective marginalized life affected by, but ignored and locked-out from heat gov. Empirical-methodolgical-conceptual stance and value commitment in my research. - standpoint - haraway - subaltern studies
 * Feminist STS**

How heat is sensed and made sense of, not only bodily-experientially, but also sensory of science, governance etc. --> how do different sensories of heat, time, place and their falling together allow for action, counteraction, problematization, ...?
 * Sensory and Epistemology**

__**Theoretical Literatures (overarching, broad)**__

>> People:
 * **Ignorance** || * structural ignorance
 * organized ignorance (measuring, thresholds, emergency plans)
 * strategic ignorance (re. innovation, trees, etc.)
 * compartmentalization
 * front- vs. backstage science (--> heat modeling paper by ||  ||   ||
 * **Governance, Regulatory Science, Biopolitics** || * Foucault --> problematization & apparatus
 * Rose
 * Jasanoff
 * Jasanoff, Sheila (2007): Making Order: Law and Science in Action. In Hackett, Edward J. et al. (eds.): Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 3rd edition, 761-786.
 * PEOPLE: Espeland, Wendy Nelson & Sauder, Michael (2007): “Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds”. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 113, No. 1, 1-40.
 * Wang, Jessica (2005): “Imagining the Administrative State: Legal Pragmatism, Securities Regulation, and New Deal Liberalism”. Journal of Policy History, Vol. 17, No. 3, 257-293.
 * Space: Silbey, Susan S. & Ewick, Patricia (2003): The Architecture of Authority: The Place of Law in the Space of Science. In: Sarat, Austin, Douglas, Lawrence, Umphrey Martha & Arbor, Ann (eds): The Place of Law . Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 77-108.
 * Murphy
 * Agamben
 * Sloterdijk
 * **Cosmopolitics** || * Stengers
 * Ecological thinking
 * Ecosystems/climatology
 * * vs. Compartmentalization ||  ||   ||
 * **Sensory Studies, writ large** || * sensory studies, narrow (body, physiology)
 * Biopolitics, Bodypolitics, statistics
 * Mol, Cussins
 * Mol, Cussins


 * epidemiology
 * toxicology
 * medical and health sciences
 * counting/discounting bodies
 * scientific sensories, sensing, measuring,
 * modeling
 * mapping
 * charting ||  ||   ||
 * **Expertise, Authority, Public** || * __Issue making__ Marres et al
 * **care/minding**
 * social movements
 * feminist/postcolonial lit
 * Anti-PUS/aPUS/PE
 * Anti citizen-science
 * "Infrastructuring"?
 * Popular science v Traditional science (Coburn)
 * Stages (Goffman/Hillgartner)


 * --> ignorance
 * --> governance
 * --> biopower and body politics ||  ||   ||
 * Urban/rural; Colonialism ||  ||   ||   ||
 * D-STS || * Galison, Peter (2000): An Accident of History. In: Galison, Peter & Roland, Alex (eds.): Archimedes: Atmosphere Flight in the Twentieth Century . Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 3-43.
 * Welke, Barbara Young (2001): Recasting American Liberty: Gender, Race, Law, and the Railroad Revolution, 1865- 1920 . Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 235-279.
 * Silbey, Susan S. & Cavicchi, Ayn (2005): The Common Place of Law: Transforming Matters of Concern into the Objects of Everyday Life. In: Latour, Bruno & Weibel, Peter (eds.): Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 556-65.
 * Kelty, Christopher (2011): Inventing Copyleft. In: Biagioli, Mario, Jaszi, Peter & Woodmansee, Martha (eds.): Making and Unmaking Intellectual Property: Creative Production in Legal and Cultural Perspective . Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 133-148. ||  ||   ||
 * Public Health??? ||  ||   ||   ||

__**State of the Art**__
 * **Heat and Governance** || * Boezeman, D. (2016). Understanding the transformation of climate futures. A conceptual framework illustrated with urban adaptation policy. //Futures//, //76//, 30–41. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.07.008
 * Boezeman, D., & Kooij, H. J. (2015). Heated debates: The transformation of urban warming into an object of governance in the Netherlands. In R. Beunen, K. Van Assche, & M. Duineveld (Eds.), Evolutionary governance theory: Theory and applications (pp. 185–203). New York: Springer.
 * Heat sciences ||  ||
 * Heat disasters, esp. heat waves || Public health, isolation, marginalization:
 * Klinenberg, chicago
 * Keller, paris ||
 * Urban heat (v. rural heat) ||  ||
 * Problematizing heat || * Boezeman, D., & Kooij, H. J. (2015). Heated debates: The transformation of urban warming into an object of governance in the Netherlands. In R. Beunen, K. Van Assche, & M. Duineveld (Eds.), Evolutionary governance theory: Theory and applications (pp. 185–203). New York: Springer. ||
 * Problematizing heat || * Boezeman, D., & Kooij, H. J. (2015). Heated debates: The transformation of urban warming into an object of governance in the Netherlands. In R. Beunen, K. Van Assche, & M. Duineveld (Eds.), Evolutionary governance theory: Theory and applications (pp. 185–203). New York: Springer. ||

Science and "The Public"

A brief history of science in public
> http://seedmagazine.com/content/print/the_essential_parallel_between_science_and_democracy. > Brown, M. (2009): Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation. In (ibid.): How science becomes political. Harvard: MIT Press. Chapter 8, 185-199.
 * Jasanoff, S. (2009): The Essential Parallel Between Science and Democracy. In: Seed Magazine, February 17. Available at:
 * **Shapin, S. (1990). Science and the Public. In R. C. Olby, G. N. Cantor, J. R. R. Christie & M. J. S. Hodge (Eds.), Companion to the History of Modern Science (pp. 990-1007). London: Routledge.**
 * **Cooter, R., & Pumfrey, S. (1994). Separate Spheres and Public Places: Reflections on the History of Science Popularization and Science in Popular Culture. History of Science, 32(3), 237-267.**
 * Bennett, T. (1997). Regulated Restlessness: Museums, Liberal Government and the Historical Sciences. Economy and Society 26(2), 161-190.

The ‘deficit to dialogue’ story
> **Science, 1(3), 281-304.** > **Upstream (pp. 13-24). London: Demos.**
 * **Durant, J., Evans, G., & Thomas, G. P. (1989). The Public Understanding of Science. Nature, 340, 11-14.**
 * **Wynne, B. (1992). Misunderstood Misunderstanding: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science. Public Understanding of**
 * **Wilsdon, J., & Willis, R. (2004). Chapter 1: The Stage is Set. In See-through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move**
 * Gregory, J., & Miller, S. (1998). Chapter 10: A Protocol for Science Communication for the Public Understanding of Science. In Science in Public: Communication, Culture and Credibility (pp. 242-250). New York: Plenum Press.
 * **Elam, M., & Bertilsson, M. (2003). Consuming, engaging and confronting science: the emerging dimensions of scientific citizenship, European Journal of Social Theory 6(2), 233-251.**
 * Wynne, B. (2007). Public Participation in Science and Technology: Performing and Obscuring a Political- Conceptual Category Mistake. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: an International Journal, 1(1), 99-110.
 * Stirling, A. (2008). ‘Opening Up’ and ‘Closing Down’: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 33(2), 262-294.
 * **Irwin, A. (2001). Constructing the Scientific Citizen: Science and Democracy in the Biosciences. Public**
 * Understanding of Science, 10(1), 1-18.**

Diversification, professionalisation, and frustration

 * **Irwin, A. (2008). Risk, Science and Public Communication: Third Order Thinking About Scientific Culture. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology (pp. 199-212). London/New York: Routledge.**
 * Horst, M. (2011). Taking Our Own Medicine: On an Experiment in Science Communication. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(4), 801-815.
 * **Bucchi, M. (2013). Style in Science Communication. Public Understanding of Science, 22(8), 904-915.**
 * Grand, A. (2012, May 31). Reaching Out: The Café Scientifique Movement. Soapbox Science at Nature.com. Retrieved No- vember 13, 2013 from http://blogs.nature.com/soapboxscience/2012/05/31/reaching-out-the-cafe-scientifique-movement.
 * Irwin, A. (2006). The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the ‘New’ Scientific Governance. Social Studies of Science, 36(2), 299-320.
 * **Marres, N. (2007). The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy. Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 759-780.**
 * **Bogner, A. (2012). The Paradox of Participation Experiments. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 37(5), 506-527.**
 * Pielke, Jr., R. A. (2007): The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-21.

The stuff of engagement: Exploring materiality

 * **Marres, N. (2009). Testing Powers of Engagement: Green Living Experiments, the Ontological Turn and the Undoability of In- volvement. European Journal of Social Theory 12(1), 117-133.**
 * Söderqvist, T., Bencard, A., & Mordhorst, C. (2009). Between Meaning Culture and Presence Effects: Contemporary Biomedi- cal Objects as a Challenge to Museums. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 40(4), 431-438.
 * **Davies, S. R. (2009). Doing Dialogue: Genre and Flexibility in Public Engagement with Science. Science as Culture, 18(4), 397-416.**
 * **Felt, U. and Fochler, M. (2010): Machineries for Making Publics: Inscribing and Describing Publics. In: Public Engagement, Minerva 48(3), 219-238.**
 * Orgad, S. (2006): The cultural dimensions of online communication: a study of breast cancer patients’ internet spaces. In: New Media & Society, 8(6), 877-899.
 * Callon, M. (2007): Hybrid Forums. In: Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. and Barthe, Y.: Acting in an uncertain world. An essay on technical democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press. Chapter 1, 13-36.
 * **Felt, U. (2013): Keeping technologies out: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the formation of a national technopolitical identity. Manuscript available at: http://sciencestudies.univie.ac.at/publikationen.**

Beyond discourse in practice and analysis
> 37(5), 528-554. > Science Studies, 25(1), 13-36.
 * **Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S., & Tutton, R. (2007). Shifting Subject Positions: Experts and Lay People in Public Dialogue. Social Studies of Science, 37(3), 385-411.**
 * **Young, I. M. (2001). Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy. Political Theory, 29(5), 670-690.**
 * Richardson, L. (2002). Writing Sociology. Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies, 2(3), 414-422.
 * Franklin, J. (1978). Mrs. Kelly’s Monster. Baltimore Sun. Retrieved November 13, 2013 from http://www.jonfranklin.com/Stories/Mrs_Kellys_Monster.html.
 * **Le Dantec, C., & DiSalvo, C. (2013). Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science, 43(2), 241-264.**
 * **Godin, B. (2012). Social Innovation: Utopias of Innovation from c. 1830 to the Present. Project on the Intellectual History of Innovation (Working Paper No. 11).**
 * Michael, M. (2012). ‘What Are We Busy Doing?’: Engaging the Idiot. Science, Technology, & Human Values,
 * Elgaard Jensen, T. (2012). Intervention by Invitation: New Concerns and New Versions of the User in STS.
 * Lezaun, J., and Soneryd, L. (2007): Consulting citizens: Technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics. In: Public Understanding of Science, 16, 279-297.
 * Wynne, B. (2007): Public Participation in Science and Technology: Performing and Obscuring a Political-Conceptual Category Mistake. In: East Asian Science, Technology and Society, 1(1), 99-110.

STS and "The City" (selection of articles largely based on a course I took, "STS and 'The City'", taught by Ignacio Farias at University of Vienna)

Science, Technology IN the city
__Cities as sociotechnical artefacts?__ __Networked infrastructures and splintering urbanism__ __Cities as metabolic systems__
 * Winner, L. (1980). Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121-136.
 * **Aibar, E., & Bijker, W. E. (1997). Constructing a City: The Cerda Plan for the Extension of Barcelona. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 22(1), 3-30.**
 * **Hommels, A. (2005). Obduracy in the City. Three Conceptual Models. In Unbuilding Cities. Obduracy in Urban Sociotechnical Change (pp. 1-39). Cambridge/London: MIT Press.**
 * Latour, B. (1996). An Exciting Innovation. In Aramis, or the Love of Technology (pp. 12-50). Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
 * **Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London/New York: Routledge.**
 * **Coutard, O., & Guy, S. (2007). STS and the City: Politics and Practices of Hope. Science, Technology & Human Values, 32(6), 713-734.**
 * **Joerges, B. (1996). Large Technical Systems and the Discourse of Complexity. In L. Ingelstam (Ed.), Complex Technical Systems (pp. 55-72). Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research, Stockholm: Affärs Litteratur.**
 * **Swyngedouw, E. (2006). Metabolic Urbanization: The Making of Cyborg Cities. In N. Heynen, M. Kaika & E. Swyngedouw (Eds.), In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism (pp. 20-39). Abingdon/New York: Routledge.**
 * Robbins, P., & Sharp, J. (2006). Turfgrass subjects: the political economy of urban monoculture. In N. Heynen, M. Kaika & E. Swyngedouw (Eds.), In the Nature of Cities. Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism (pp. 106-123). Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
 * Blok, A. (2013). Urban Green Assemblages: An ANT View on Sustainable City Building Projects. Science & Technology Studies, 26(1), 5-24.
 * Lachmund, J. (2012). The Emergence of a Policy: Ecologists and the Species Protection Program. In Greening Berlin: Co-Production of Science, Politics and Urban Nature (pp. 89-124). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Urban Build Environment
__What is a building?__ __Urban built environment__
 * **Gieryn, T. F. (2002). What Buildings Do. Theory and Society, 31(1), 35-74.**
 * **Guggenheim, M. (2009). Mutable Immobiles: Building Conversion as a Problem of Quasi-Technologies. In I.Farías & T. Bender (Eds.), Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies (pp. 161-178). Abingdon/New York: Routledge.**
 * Latour, B., & Yaneva, A. (2008). ‘Give Me a Gun and I Will Make All Buildings Move’: An ANT’s View of Architecture. In R. Geiser (Ed.), Explorations in Architecture: Teaching, Design, Research (pp. 80-89). Basel: Birkhäuser.
 * Degen, M., Rose, G., & Basdas, B. (2010), Bodies and everyday practices in designed urban environments. Science Studies, 23(2), 60-76,
 * Brand, R., & Fregonese, S. (2013). Polarisation as a Socio-Material Phenomenon: A Bibliographical Review. In The Radicals' City: Urban Environment, Polarisation, Cohesion (pp. 15-28). Farnham: Ashgate.
 * Brand, R., & Fregonese, S. (2013). Implications for Planning Practice and Policy. In The Radicals’ City: Urban Environment, Polarisation, Cohesion (pp. 123-133). Farnham: Ashgate.
 * **Strebel, I. (2011). The Living Building: Towards a Geography of Maintenance Work. Social & Cultural Geography, 12(3), 243-262.**

Urbanisms, Assemblages

 * **Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). The Machinic City. In Cities. Reimagining the Urban (pp. 78-104). Cambridge/Oxford: Polity.**
 * **Latour, B., & Hermant, E. (1998). Paris Ville Invisible. Paris: La Découverte. Sequences: 2. Proportioning and 3. Distributing. Retrieved from http://www.bruno-latour.fr/virtual/EN/index.html**
 * **Ureta, S. (2014). The Shelter that Wasn’t There: On the Politics of Co-ordinating Multiple Urban Assemblages in Santiago, Chile. Urban Studies, 51(2), 231-246**
 * Färber, A. (2014). Low-budget Berlin: towards an understanding of low-budget urbanity as assemblage. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(1), 119-136.
 * Bender, T. (2009), Postscript. Reassembling the City: Networks and Urban Imaginaries. In I. Farías & T. Bender (Eds.), Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies (pp. 303-23). Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
 * Tironi, M. (2009). Gelleable Spaces, Eventful Geographies: The Case of Santiago's Experimental Music Scene. In I. Farías & T. Bender (Eds.) Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies (pp. 27-52). Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
 * McFarlane, C. (2011). Assemblage and Critical Urbanism. City, 15(2), 204-224.
 * **Brenner, N., Madden, D. J., & Wachsmuth, D. (2011). Assemblage Urbanism and the Challenges of Critical Urban Theory. City, 15(2), 225-240.**
 * Angelo, H. (2011). Hard-wired experience. City, 15(5), 570-576.
 * Tonkiss, F. (2011). Template urbanism. City, 15(5), 584-588.

Sensory Studies: General, Heat Great Resource]

**General:**

 * **David Howes, ed. (2005) Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader. New York: Berg.**
 * **Constance Classen. 1997. “Foundations for an Anthropology of the Senses.” International Social Science Journal 153: 401-412.**
 * **Mauss, Marcel. 1979. “Body Techniques.” In Sociology and Psychology Essays, 95-109, trans. Ben Brewster, 120-123. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.**
 * **Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. “Structures, Habitus, Practices.” In TheLogic of Practice, 52-65. Trans. by Richard Nice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.**
 * Geurts, Katherine Linn. 2005. “Consciousness as ‘Feeling in the Body’ A West African Theory of Embodiment, Emotion, and Making of Mind.” In Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader, 164-177.
 * McLuhan, Marshall. 2005. “Inside the Five Sense Sensorium.” In Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader, 43-51.

**Power**

 * **Foucault, Michel. 1977. “Panopticism,” in Discipline and Punish, 195-228 (trans. Alan Sheridan). New York: Vintage Books.**
 * **Ranciere, Jacques. 2004. “The Distribution of the Sensible: Politics and Aesthetics.” In The Politics of Aesthetics, 12-30. London: Continuum.**

**In-Ability to Sense (relevante to heat wave and its victims**

 * **Keller, Helen. 2006. “Sense and Sensibility.” In The Smell Culture Reader, 181-183. Ed. Jim Drobnick. New York: Berg.**
 * **Hull, John. 2005. “Rainfall and the Blind Body.” In The Book of Touch, 324-327. Ed. Constance Classen. New York:Berg.**
 * **“The Senses Disordered.” In Empire of the Senses: The SensualCulture Reader, 357-359. Ed. David Howes. New York: Berg.**
 * Ekman, Hans-Goran. 2005. “Strindberg’s ‘Deranged Sensations’.” In Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader, 361-368. Ed. David Howes. New York: Berg.
 * Fletcher, Christopher. 2005. “Dystoposthesia: Emplacing Environmental Sensitivities.” In Empire of the Senses: The Sensual
 * **Annette Leibing and Lawrence Cohen. 2006. Thinking about Dementia: Culture, Loss, and he Anthropology of Senility. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.**

**Heat**
Ong, B. L. (2012). Warming up to Heat. The Senses and Society, 7(1), 5-21.

Lara, A. (2015). Affect, Heat and Tacos. A Speculative Account of Thermoception. The Senses and Society, 10(3), 275-297.

Nash, A., & Carroll, M. (2006). The urban sensorium. The Senses and Society, 1(2), 283-288.

Kabel, A. (2016). Disability, the Senses and Apparel: Design Considerations. The Senses and Society, 11(2), 206-210.

Gabrys, J. (2007). Automatic sensation: environmental sensors in the digital city. The Senses and Society, 2(2), 189-200.

Cohen, R. (1997). Environmental criteria for naturally ventilated buildings. Naturally ventilated buildings: Buildings for the senses, economy and society, 105-122.

Fisher, J. (2011). Architectures, Therapeutics, Aesthetics. The Senses and Society, 6(2), 250-254.

Sainsbury, W., & George, D. (2006). Senses of identity. The Senses and Society, 1(3), 409-412.

Furthermore: