WilliamsCommentPPTCostelloe-KuehnBrandon

Brandon Costelloe-Kuehn Tuesday, April 21, 2009 10:05 AM Proposal Presentation Review Reviewer: Logan Williams Time: 137-202 EMPIRICAL Intellectual merit slide CONCEPTUAL Storytelling slide; intellectual merit slide; literature review slide METHODOLOGICAL Rabinow recursive experimentation (sounds interesting) PRACTICAL See answer to question number 5 OVERVIEW Background slide included your personal expertise; good Preparation slide did as well NEW KNOWLEDGE Research questions slide; "innovative tactics" is a good term… I can imagine scholars discussing innovative tactics in contentious politics :) HOW Experimental media I assume DATA TYPES Interviews; participant observation Yes; a lot of sites though (me too!) storytelling slide; research as toolbox on collective creation (neat) Broader significance slide; Other dissemination not covered; out of time important for environmental issues; globlization effects; these are occurring now so the time is now clear; talking to paper (be careful) Sorry I forgot to introduce you! Freedom/?? Binary -- you said something about avoiding this; how?
 * 1. Did the presentation clearly describe the aims of the research – empirical, conceptual, methodological and practical?**
 * 2. Did the presentation provide an overview of what we already know about the research subject, and then explain how the proposed research will create new knowledge?**
 * 3. Did the presentation provide a robust sense of** //**how**// **the research will be carried out, and of the type of data that will be collected?**
 * 4. Did the research plan presented seem credible and feasible?**
 * 5. Did the presentation provide a tangible sense of the book and other outcomes of the research?**
 * 6. Did the presentation persuade you that the proposed research is important, in this historical moment in particular?**
 * 7. Was the speaking style clear, engaging and well timed?**
 * 8. Further comments and questions.**