Peopling+a+Project+EF

__MEMO: Peopling a Project__ Further stratifying -- Maker's who run spaces, makers who use spaces // citizen scientists who run projects, citizen scientists who participate?? || **CORROSIONS** || Citizens curious about making and wanting to get involved  || * Exclusion due to lack of expertise Hackers/Tinkerers with an anti-authoritarian, anti-consumerism bent || * Resources and funding Makers/Innovators with a entrepreneurship bent || * Resources and funding Innovation Companies seeking to recruit and patent || * Distrust from makers/hackers Scientists || * Constricted by funding and coming up with projects that will garner funds Citizen Scientists || * Lack of resources and funding
 * **CATALYSTS** ||  **TYPES/GROUP OF PEOPLE**
 * * Curiosity
 * Interest in helping the greater community
 * opportunities for entrepreneurship and making for daily life
 * knowledge of what is needed and wanted in their particular community ||
 * lack of motivation or possibly easily discouraged
 * Lack of resources or funding, ||
 * * Curiosity
 * Creative drive to make
 * Distrust of gov’t and consumer culture
 * proliferation of open-source and DIY ethic, more knowledge for the people ||
 * conflict of interest and compartmentalization with possibilities of entrepreneurship ||
 * * Creative drive to make
 * innovation toward personal business ventures
 * anti-big business and corporations
 * 3-D printing making mass production cheaper and easier to do in-house ||
 * may butt heads with hackers/tinkerers
 * navigating issues of patent law and big corporations,
 * finding audiences for their products ||
 * * Have the monetary capital to seek out and recruit spaces
 * have the authority to access certain spaces and certain information regarding patents and inventions within their own companies ||
 * Lack of physical access to spaces
 * open-source mentalities ||
 * * Given scientific authority due to schooling
 * access to equipment and analytical tools
 * may direct projects a certain way and have some voice in the research their labs do ||
 * IRB
 * What is considered relevant by the greater scientific community
 * Bureaucratic dealings within scientific community ||
 * * Personally invested in a project that affects their community
 * have the time to collect data
 * often situated in spaces that need monitoring
 * Have a situated knowledge of what is happening in the world ||
 * Told the science instead of exploring themselves
 * Lack of access to learn certain scientific expertise
 * Data and scientific inquiry may not be taken seriously by the greater scientific community ||