Three+Literatures_pedlt3

These literatures explore the complex relationships between history, memory, the “present,” expectations, and prediction in governance and the making of spaces.
 * Social Temporalities **


 * Adam M. Hedgecoe, Erik Fisher, Cynthia Selin, and David H. Guston. 2007. “Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnology: Foresight, Engagement, and Integration.” In // The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies //, edited by Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael E. Lynch, and Judy Wajcman, third edition, 979–1000. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
 * Anderson, B, and P Adey. 2012. “Future Geographies.” // Environment and Planning A // 44 (7): 1529–1535.
 * Bender, J, and David E. Wellbery, ed. 1991. // Chronotypes: The Construction of Time // . Stanford: Stanford University Press.
 * Bryan-Wilson, Julia. 2003. “Building a Marker of Nuclear Warning.” In // Monuments and Memory, Made and Unmade //, edited by Robert S. Nelson and Margaret Olin, 183–204. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
 * Comaroff, John L. 1992. // Ethnography and the Historical Imagination // . Studies in the Ethnographic Imagination. Boulder: Westview Press.
 * Dalsgaard, Steffen. 2012. “Fieldwork or ‘event-Work’?” In // Anthropological Temporalities: Methods and Ontology of Multi-Temporal Ethnography // . San Francisco, CA.
 * Fabian, J. 1983. // Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object // . New York: Columbia University Press.
 * Fortun, Kim. 2000. “Remebering Bhopal, Re-figuring Liability.” // Interventions // 2 (2): 187–198.
 * Guyer, Jane I. 2007. “Prophecy and the Near Future :” 34 (3): 409–421. doi:10.1525/ae.2007.34.3.409.American.
 * Hedgecoe, Adam M., and Paul A. Martin. 2007. “Genomics, STS, and the Making of Sociotechnical Futures.” In // The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies //, edited by Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael E. Lynch, and Judy Wajcman, third edition, 818–839. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
 * Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. 1995. // Silencing the past: power and the production of history // . Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press.

Writings in this category explore the often dangerous aspects of sociotechnical systems, the distribution of “environmental” risks, the concepts through which “nature” or the “environment” is or should be understood, and the ways that these topics shape various socialities, knowledges, and politics.
 * Environment, Nature, & Risk **


 * Bennett, Jane. 2009. // Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things // . Durham: Duke University Press Books.
 * Dunlap, Riley E., and Fredrick H. Buttel, ed. 2002. // Sociological Theory and the Environment: Classical Foundations, Contemporary Insights // . Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
 * Fortun, Kim. 2001. // Advocacy After Bhopal: Environmentalism, Disaster, New Global Orders // . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
 * Gusterson, Hugh. 2000. “How Not to Construct a Radioactive Waste Incinerator.” // Science, Technology & Human Values // 25 (3) (July): 332–351.
 * Hanson, RD. 2001. “Half Lives of Reagan’s Indian Policy: Marketing Nuclear Waste to American Indians.” // American Indian Culture and Research Journal // 25 (1): 21–44.
 * Hecht, Gabrielle. 2012. // Being Nuclear: Africans and the Global Uranium Trade // . Cambridge: MIT press.
 * Mascarenhas, Michael. 2012. “Rethinking Environmental Racism: White Privilege and Urban Development in Southern Ontario, Canada.”
 * Masco, Joseph. 2006. // The Nuclear Borderlands: The Manhattan Project in Post-Cold War New Mexico // . Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
 * Murphy, Michelle. 2008. “Chemical Regimes of Living.” // Environmental History // 13 (4): 695–703.
 * ———. 2011. “Time in the Data of Cholera.”
 * Petryna, Adriana. 2002. // Life exposed: biological citizens after Chernobyl // . Princeton [N.J.]: Princeton University Press.
 * Smith, N. 2008. // Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space // . 3rd ed. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
 * Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. 2005. // Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection // . Princeton: Princeton University Press.

These works explore not only the study of ethical practice and imaginaries, but also the relation between the ethical, political, and legal; the recognition and representation of subjects, particularly “distant” ones; and the recognition of injury, harm, or suffering.
 * Subjects: Ethics, Rights, and Representation **


 * Alcoff, Linda. 1991. “The Problem of Speaking for Others.” // Cultural Critique // (20): 5. doi:10.2307/1354221.
 * Corvellec, Hervé. 2011. “The narrative structure of risk accounts.” // Risk Management // 13 (3) (July): 101–121.
 * Faubion, James D. 2011. // An Anthropology of Ethics // . New Departures in Anthropology. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
 * Foucault, Michel. 1997. // Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth // . Edited by Paul Rabinow. Vol. 1. 3 vols. The essential works of Michel Foucault. New York: New Press.
 * Gusterson, H. 1996. // Nuclear Rites: A Weapons Laboratory at the End of the Cold War // . Berkeley: University of California Press.
 * Jain, Sarah S. Lochlann. 2006. // Injury: Product Design in the United States // . Princeton, N.J.; Woodstock: Princeton University Press.
 * Lakoff, Andrew, and Stephen J. Collier. 2004. “Ethics and the Anthropology of Modern Reason.” // Anthropological Theory // 4 (4) (December 1): 419–434.
 * Lambek, Michael, ed. 2010. // Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language, and Action // . 1st ed. New York: Fordham University Press.
 * Probyn, Elspeth. 2001. “Anxious Proximities: The Space-Time of Concepts.” In // Timespace: Geographies of Temporality //, edited by Jon May and Nigel Thrift, 171–186. New York: Routledge.
 * Rancière, Jacques. 1999. // Disagreement : Politics and Philosophy // . Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota Press.
 * Till, Karen E. 2012. “Wounded Cities: Memory-work and a Place-based Ethics of Care.” // Political Geography // 31 (1) (January): 3–14.