Sonya(Jon+C)

Proposal Presentation Review

Presenter: Jon C Reviewer: Tahereh Saheb(Sonya)


 * 1. Did the presentation clearly describe the aims of the research – empirical, conceptual, methodological and practical?**

I did not get the aims distinctively based on its empirical, conceptual, methodological and practical contribution


 * 2. Did the presentation provide an overview of what we already know about the research subject, and then explain how the proposed research will create new knowledge?**


 * Yes he was very good**


 * 3. Did the presentation provide a robust sense of //how// the research will be carried out, and of the type of data that will be collected?**

NO, it was not, I wish he had used more clear slides he should have considered that some of his audiences are international students who slides and pictures will help them to understand a project well.
 * 4. Did the research plan presented seem credible and feasible?**


 * yes it is**


 * 5. Did the presentation provide a tangible sense of the book and other outcomes of the research?**

NO, it did not
 * 6. Did the presentation persuade you that the proposed research is important, in this historical moment in particular?**


 * yes, it did**


 * 7. Was the speaking style clear, engaging and well timed?**


 * No, he was not, he has not too much eye contact with the listeners that was not engaging to me caz sometimes I was baffled what he is talking about** ** L **


 * 8. Further comments and questions.**