LamprouCommentsWilliams

Proposal Presentation Review

Presenter: Logan Williams Reviewer: Anna Lamprou

I think that the aims were there, although in the presentation this wasn't very clear. I couldn't see very clear the connections between the literature review and the aims of the study. Yes, Logan knows well the background and I am sure there is new knowledge but the connection to literature wasn't very clear. Yes, Logan has identified the fields of study and I think is in the correct path. Yes very much. The outcomes: Yes a book about that will provide a framework for the NGOs. Yes it is important because blindness is an important Issue especially if it can be avoided. Yes, but I would prefer it if she was speaking louder if possible.
 * 1. Did the presentation clearly describe the aims of the research – empirical, conceptual, methodological and practical? **
 * 2. Did the presentation provide an overview of what we already know about the research subject, and then explain how the proposed research will create new knowledge? **
 * 3. Did the presentation provide a robust sense of //how// the research will be carried out, and of the type of data that will be collected? **
 * 4. Did the research plan presented seem credible and feasible? **
 * 5. Did the presentation provide a tangible sense of the book and other outcomes of the research? **
 * 6. Did the presentation persuade you that the proposed research is important, in this historical moment in particular? **
 * 7. Was the speaking style clear, engaging and well timed? **
 * 8. Further comments and questions. **