LamprouCommentEdel

Proposal Presentation Review

Presenter: Gareth Edel Reviewer: Anna Lamprou

His presentation was very clear on conceptual, but not on empirical and conceptual aims. Yes, I think Gareth knows well the research object/subject. No one has done a similar scientific research, so this is the new knowledge. How we think about care? How care becomes choice. Not very clear, he has already chosen the sites and has done enough research before the field research. But he didn't say much about the methods Well, not very clear. Yes the book I think and the outcomes are going to be about care as a choice. The neoliberal way if you ask me. I think so. It describes a reality result of the neoliberal Influence. Care as choice even more as an individualistic choice changes the Idea of health as a human right. Yes as always clear but not well timed.
 * 1. Did the presentation clearly describe the aims of the research – empirical, conceptual, methodological and practical? **
 * 2. Did the presentation provide an overview of what we already know about the research subject, and then explain how the proposed research will create new knowledge? **
 * 3. Did the presentation provide a robust sense of //how// the research will be carried out, and of the type of data that will be collected? **
 * 4. Did the research plan presented seem credible and feasible? **
 * 5. Did the presentation provide a tangible sense of the book and other outcomes of the research? **
 * 6. Did the presentation persuade you that the proposed research is important, in this historical moment in particular? **
 * 7. Was the speaking style clear, engaging and well timed? **
 * 8. Further comments and questions. **