CluckCommentNate

Proposal Presentation Review Presenter: Nate Reviewer: Jon C. 1. Did the presentation clearly describe the aims of the research – empirical, conceptual, methodological and practical? Yes. 2. Did the presentation provide an overview of what we already know about the research subject, and then explain how the proposed research will create new knowledge? Yes.

3. Did the presentation provide a robust sense of how the research will be carried out, and of the type of data that will be collected? Yes.

4. Did the research plan presented seem credible and feasible? Yes.

5. Did the presentation provide a tangible sense of the book and other outcomes of the research? Very much so.

6. Did the presentation persuade you that the proposed research is important, in this historical moment in particular? Yes.

7. Was the speaking style clear, engaging and well timed? Definitely. You have a lot of practice presenting your work and it shows.

8. Further comments and questions. I'm always amused at the pedobear references -- it's great to see how something from the internet that I find so disturbing can be made sense of in an academically rigorous way.