CluckCommentBrandon

Proposal Presentation Review Presenter: Brandon Reviewer: Jon C. 1. Did the presentation clearly describe the aims of the research – empirical, conceptual, methodological and practical? Yes, twice.

2. Did the presentation provide an overview of what we already know about the research subject, and then explain how the proposed research will create new knowledge? Yes, very clearly.

3. Did the presentation provide a robust sense of how the research will be carried out, and of the type of data that will be collected? Yes.

4. Did the research plan presented seem credible and feasible? Yes.

5. Did the presentation provide a tangible sense of the book and other outcomes of the research? No tangible sense of a book, but you're still early in your research...

6. Did the presentation persuade you that the proposed research is important, in this historical moment in particular? Yes it did, and you should be the one doing it.

7. Was the speaking style clear, engaging and well timed? You seemed a little nervous while speaking...

8. Further comments and questions. I think that your presentation could use some re-arranging so you don't repeat everything twice in the span of 15 minutes, and so you can use the extra time to talk about your work more in-depth.